Jump back to quoted post, 16:40 PM Sander93 It's best used on smaller maps where it can just stay in one area and can't get flanked easily. The Tiger II is more tanky and deals more damage, but is a lot slower. It's better than the Tiger II in larger maps because of its higher mobility. I think the Tiger is a bit better at sniping models while the Tiger II will deal 30-50% health damage to the entire squad per shot because of its larger AOE.Īs for the overal performance of the units, the Tiger I is more of a Panther that can also damage infantry.
The Tiger II deals 240 damage per shot while the Tiger deals only 160 damage per shot, so the Tiger II deals a lot more damage (its reload is only 1s worse) to vehicles. The Tiger II has 375 armor and 1280 health. I also think the Tiger does more damage to infantry or something? Soldier for example Tiger is easier and cheaper to get but I think lacks the health and armor of the KT, however I remember me and sander having a discussion in the shoutbox some time ago and he told me that for balance reasons both tanks do almost the same damage to vehicles.
